Explore Med-AI Clinical

Try the review. Start free.

Edit a synthetic report, inspect its discrepancies, and explore a workflow that keeps clinicians responsible for the final report.

Try the interactive demo Get free access

Public demo · No sign-in · Synthetic radiology and laboratory cases · No patient uploads

01 / Interactive clinical demo

Find the discrepancy. Make the correction.

Choose a radiology or laboratory case, compare the supplied observations with the draft, then edit FINDINGS, COMPARISON and IMPRESSION.

Read the synthetic source. Each teaching draft intentionally contains a reporting issue.
Run demo QA. Inspect the case-specific consistency checks and their explanations.
Edit and rerun. Check your revision, view an example, or reset the exercise.
Share the case. Each visitor starts with the original draft; your edits are not included in the link.

Try radiology Try laboratory

The public demo uses local teaching rules, not an AI model or the production QA engine. Edits stay in page memory. Passing these checks is not clinical clearance.

From exploration to evaluation

Four ways to learn from real workflow needs.

Public experiences help teams explore. Signed-in tools capture clinician feedback and centre-level pilot evidence.

02 / SIGNED-IN WORKSPACE

Feedback inside the report workspace

Flag a wrong suggestion, explain what was missed, and submit a proposed correction linked to a saved report.

Use the selected QA suggestion as context.
Review saved feedback with its clinician, timestamp and report snapshot.
Keep feedback separate from clinical editing and sign-off.

Available to Doctor and Hospital Admin accounts. Feedback does not automatically change a report or train a model.

Worklist → saved report → Clinician feedback

03 / PUBLIC APPLICATION

Free early access for your centre

Tell us which reporting software you use, your monthly report volume, team size and main workflow problem.

Describe the integrations your team needs.
Include a contact person and consent for early-access follow-up.
Receive an application reference after submission is saved.

No account, credit card or patient reports required. Product use is free during early access. We confirm access and capacity after reviewing your request.

Get free access

04 / PUBLIC CASE LIBRARY

Educational cases worth discussing

Read a synthetic reporting issue alongside its explanation and a correction reviewed by a clinician in Med-AI.

See the original issue and correction together.
Check the recorded review and publication dates.
Copy a read-only case link for community discussions.

Only explicitly published cases appear. Draft examples require Doctor review before publication; the library may be empty until cases are approved and published.

Browse educational cases

For authors: workspace sidebar → Educational cases

05 / SIGNED-IN PILOT RESULTS

Evidence with visible denominators

Assess recorded centre activity over a selected UTC date window, with sample sizes and definitions alongside the results.

Useful / not-useful QA ratings and rating coverage.
Saved editing revisions and explicit EDITED sign-offs.
Median and 90th-percentile creation-to-signature time.
Active staff adoption and aggregate JSON export.

Turnaround includes waiting time; revisions are an effort proxy. Missing data is marked “Not measured.” No baseline means no claim of time savings or clinical accuracy.

Workspace sidebar → Pilot results

Start with your workflow

What would make reporting better for your team?

Try a synthetic case first, then tell us where your centre needs help. Keep patient information out of demos and access requests.

Get free access Read the validation approach