Clinician agreement
How often drafts are accepted, edited, or rejected before signature.
Validation
A pilot plan that creates buyer evidence.
The next stage is not more feature spread. It is a focused retrospective validation pilot that proves report QA value on real workflow data under clinician supervision.
Why this matters
The product needs proof, not bigger promises.
A hospital or imaging group will buy when the product can show fewer QA misses, faster review handling, measurable clinician agreement, and clean governance. The pilot is designed to collect that evidence safely.
Correction categories
Laterality, comparison, missing context, wording, urgency, and unsupported statements.
Operational lift
Queue movement, review time, escalation handling, and workload visibility.
Safety posture
How uncertainty, source gaps, and critical findings are handled during review.
Eight-week pilot
A focused validation path.
Weeks 1-2
Workflow mapping and data scoping
Agree modalities, report types, review process, PHI boundaries, and success metrics.
Weeks 3-4
Retrospective run
Run selected historical studies through the QA workflow with synthetic or de-identified data where possible.
Weeks 5-6
Clinician review
Radiologists or quality reviewers accept, edit, reject, and annotate output inside the governed workspace.
Weeks 7-8
Evidence report
Deliver pilot metrics, issue categories, workflow recommendations, and production-readiness gaps.